Prediction of Kimberly Birrell [62nd] vs Maddison Inglis [132nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W L L W
Form
L W L W W L L W W LHead To Head: Birrell 4 - 2 Inglis
They have played 16 sets in total, with Birrell winning 9 and Inglis winning 7. The last match between Birrell and Inglis was at the W75 Brisbane, 09-02-2025, Final, Hard with Kimberly Birrell getting the victory 6-2 4-6 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kimberly Birrell | 4 |
| Maddison Inglis | 2 |
| Birrell | Stats | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| 75% (21-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (15-8) |
| 4 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 62 | Ranking | 132 |
| 61 | Highest Rank | 112 |
| 26 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 9 |
| 56% (242-194) | Career Total W/L | 60% (293-197) |
| $891,948 | Career Prize Money | $460,080 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 4 | Hard H2H | 2 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Maddison Inglis
61%
(
77 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
3
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
5
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
57 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kimberly Birrell
50%
(
39 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 3-6 7-5 6-4 | |||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Maddison Inglis
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kimberly Birrell
65%
(
72 of
111)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
50 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Maddison Inglis
59%
(
71 of
120)
1st Serve %
47%
(
53 of
113)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
13
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
47%
(
56 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 9 | Sets Won | 7 |
| 86 | Games Won | 77 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 21 |
| 22 | Total Double Faults | 32 |
| 2:2:40 | Average Match Time | 2:2:40 |
| 60% (283/470) | 1st Serve % | 59% (270/461) |
| 61% (172/283) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (158/270) |
| 49% (91/187) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (93/191) |
| 46% (26/57) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (21/53) |
| 46% (210/461) | Return Points Win % | 44% (207/470) |
| 67% (4/6) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (1/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 75% (3/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 75% (4/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kimberly Birrell vs Maddison Inglis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Birrell 4 - 2 Inglis
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Birrell has won 45.09% of points on their second serve, while Inglis has won 41.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Birrell, in recent form, has won 48.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Inglis has won 46.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.03% and 30.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Birrell has saved 48.34% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Inglis has saved 47.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Birrell has won 68.54% of matches played (W/L 61/ 28), with Inglis winning 65.79% (W/L 50/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Birrell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 180/ 129), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 4/ 11). Inglis has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 235/ 146), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Birrell has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 25/ 10), where as Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.49% of matches (W/L 41/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Birrell winning 4 times and Inglis being victorious 2 times. They have played 16 sets in total, with Birrell winning 9 and Inglis winning 7. The last match between Birrell and Inglis was at the W75 Brisbane, 09-02-2025, Final, Hard with Kimberly Birrell getting the victory 6-2 4-6 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:2:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Birrell and Inglis have played a deciding set 4 times, with Birrell winning 3 times and Inglis 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 4 tiebreaks against each other with Birrell winning 1, and Inglis 3.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Birrell has played against opponents with an average rank of 206.33 while Inglis has played against players with an average rank of 272.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Birrell has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Inglis has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Birrell has converted 40.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Inglis has converted 34.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Kimberly Birrell vs Maddison Inglis Best Odds For The Match
Kimberly Birrell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Yuliana Lizarazo
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
122%
(
56 of
46)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Kimberly Birrell
113%
(
81 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Kimberly Birrell
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Anastasia Potapova
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
52%
(
52 of
100)
3
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
2
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Harriet Dart
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Kimberly Birrell
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Viktorija Golubic
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Cristina Bucsa
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Kristina Penickova
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
13
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Erika Andreeva
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Emily Appleton
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Maddison Inglis
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Aoi Ito
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Anna Bondar
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Jennifer Jackson
41%
(
26 of
64)
1st Serve %
42%
(
32 of
77)
8
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Maddison Inglis
61%
(
77 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
3
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
5
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
57 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Birrell vs Inglis?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Birrell Vs Inglis is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (242/194) | Win/Loss | 60% (293/197) |
| 54% (554/474) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (656/469) |
| 52% (4993/4672) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5449/4762) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 738 | Aces Total | 739 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1567 | Total Double Faults | 1305 |
| 1:35:52 | Average Match Time | 1:28:10 |
| 232.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 286.94 |
| 63% (17165/27195) | 1st Serve % | 65% (18158/27741) |
| 63% (10894/17165) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (11374/18158) |
| 45% (4555/10033) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4469/9583) |
| 46% (1562/3422) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1670/3487) |
| 45% (12512/27868) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12939/28697) |
| 55% (238/430) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (289/479) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 49% (57/117) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (62/95) |
| 54% (85/156) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (80/152) |
| 86% (227/195) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (289/247) |
| 14% (227/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (289/42) |
| 22% (209/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (201/46) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
